来我首页 | 新闻中心 | 考研主站 | 考研数学 | 考研英语 | 考研政治 | 考研图片 | 社区论坛 | 考研问吧 | 同路期刊 | 教育书城
英语主站 | 英语四级 | 英语六级 | 商务英语 | 外语考试 | 托福考试 | 雅思考试 | 司法考试 | 教育博客 | 考研资料 | 就业职场

注册论坛会员 注册资源站会员

 
 
70天攻克考研英语阅读 DAY67
 
08-05-22 11:20:37 来源:搜狐教育 作者:

DAY67

  Reading comprehension

  Direction: In this part, there are four passages followed by questions or unfinished statements, each with four suggested answers marked A, B, C and D. Choose the on
e that you think is the correct answer.

  Passage 1

  David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the worlds economic and social progress over the last thousand years to “western civilization and its dissemination.” The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that three unique aspects of European culture were crucial ingredients in Europes economic growth. First, science developed as an autonomous method of intellectual inquiry that successfully disengaged itself from the social constraints of organized religion and from the political constraints of centralized from the use of a single vehicle of communication: Latin. This common tongue facilitated the spread of new ideas.

  Second, Landes holds that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, “what counts are work, thrift, honesty, patience, and tenacity.” The only route to economic success for individuals of states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his books subtitle: “Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor.” For historical reasons, Europeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.

  Third, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They “learned rather greedily.” Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage, their most vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the world and put it to use as in borrowing the concept of zero and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century.

  Although his analysis of European expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: “when one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so.” He believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes advices to the postcolonial states to “stop whining and get to work.” This is particularly important, he argues, because success is not per

9 7 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 8 :

责任编辑:gaoyan

相关新闻
    无相关新闻
精彩推荐
 
网站精华
 
 

下载《同路》网络版期刊或订阅最新

关于我们 | 广告服务 | 隐私声明 | 人员招聘 | 联系我们 | 合作链接 | 渝ICP备06004721号

来我网络 版权所有

来我网络 版权所有