来我首页 | 新闻中心 | 考研主站 | 考研数学 | 考研英语 | 考研政治 | 考研图片 | 社区论坛 | 考研问吧 | 同路期刊 | 教育书城
英语主站 | 英语四级 | 英语六级 | 商务英语 | 外语考试 | 托福考试 | 雅思考试 | 司法考试 | 教育博客 | 考研资料 | 就业职场

注册论坛会员 注册资源站会员

 
 
新东方:考研英语核心词汇速成胜经 (25)
 
08-04-09 11:52:24 来源:新东方 作者:

考研英语核心词汇速成胜经Unit 25

 

一、真题文章(2005年)

 

   Canada's premiers (the leaders of provincial governments), if they have any breath left after complaining about Ottawa at their late July annual meeting, might spare a moment to do something, to reduce health-care costs.

 

    They're all groaning about soaring health budgets, the fastest-growing component of which are pharmaceutical costs.

 

   According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, prescription drug costs have risen since 1997 at twice the rate of overall health-care spending. Part of the increase comes from drugs being used to replace other kinds of treatments .Part of it arises from new drugs costing more than older kinds. Part of it is higher prices.


   What to do? Both the Romanow commission and the Kirby committee on health care---to say nothing of reports from other experts--- recommended the creation of a national drug agency. Instead of each province having its own list of approved drugs , bureaucracy, procedures and limited bargaining power, all would pool resources ,work with Ottawa, and create a national institution.


      What does “national” mean? Roy Romanow and Senator Michael Kirby recommended a federal-provincial body much like the recently created National Health Council.


     But “national” doesn't have to mean that. “National” could mean inter-provincial-provinces combining efforts to create one body.


    Either way, one benefit of a “national” organization would be to negotiate better prices, if possible, with drug manufacturers. Instead of having one province-or a series of hospitals within a province-negotiate a price for a given drug on the provincial list, the national agency would negotiate on behalf of all provinces.

  Rather than, say, Quebec, negotiating on behalf of seven million people, the national agency would negotiate on behalf 31 million people. Basic economics suggests the greater the potential consumers, the higher the likelihood of a better price.


      Of course the pharmaceutical companies will scream. They like divided buyers, they can lobby better that way. They can use the threat of removing jobs from one province to another. They can hope that, if one province includes a drug on its list , the pressure will cause others to include it on theirs. They wouldn't like a national agency, but self-interest would lead them to deal with it.


      A small step has been taken in the direction of a national agency with the creation of the Canadian Co-ordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, funded by Ottawa and the provinces. Under it, a Common Drug Review recommends to provincial lists which new drugs should be included. Predictably, and regre

9 7 3 1 2 3 4 5 4 8 :

责任编辑:zhaotingting

精彩推荐
 
网站精华
 
 

下载《同路》网络版期刊或订阅最新

关于我们 | 广告服务 | 隐私声明 | 人员招聘 | 联系我们 | 合作链接 | 渝ICP备06004721号

来我网络 版权所有