Scale and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales (both come in adult and children’s version)，其中原文的括号中指出：智力测验的两种形式都有成人版和儿童版。既然如此，说明成年人的智力测验在内容和形式两方面与儿童可能不同，因此C为正确答案。注意：C选项中的format对应原文括号中的version。A“人们不再用智商分数反映智力水平”推得过远，因为段首仅说现在智商测验不如过去频繁，这不等于取消了智商测验。B“因特网上的智商测验版本比以前更多了”与原文“不同智商测验版本充斥了万维网”不符，因为选项中的比较是原文所没有提到的。

三、主旨题

干扰选项特征：细枝末节（以例子、细节做主题）

例如，

When prehistoric man arrived in new parts of the world, something strange happened to the large animals: they suddenly became extinct. Smaller species survived. The large, slow-growing animals were easy game, and were quickly hunted to extinction. Now something similar could be happening in the oceans.

……

Dr. Myers and Dr. Worm argue that their work gives a correct baseline, which future management efforts must take into account. They believe the data support an idea current among marine biologists, that of the “shifting baseline”. The notion is that people have failed to detect the massive changes which have happened in the ocean because they have been looking back only a relatively short time into the past. That matters because theory suggests that the maximum sustainable yield that can be cropped from a fishery comes when the biomass of a target species is about 50% of its original level. Most fisheries are well below that, which is a bad way to do business.

The author seems to be mainly concerned with most fisheries’

[A] management efficiency.

[B] biomass level.

[C] catch-size limits.

[D] technological application.

问题是“作者似乎主要关注大多数渔场的哪一个方面”，这等于问文章的主题。B“生物数量水平”就是文章主题，因为作者从第二段开始都在论述这一问题，所以B选项为正确答案。A“管理效率”和C“捕获量限制”在原文未提过，D“技术应用”是细枝末节，所以它们都是干扰选项。

四、事实细节题

干扰选项特征：

1． 正反混淆（态度、有无与原文相反）

2． 无中生有（选项中的比较在原文无依据）

3． 扩大范围（选项去掉了原文的限制条件或修饰范围）

4． 因果倒置（两个事物在问题与选项中的因果关系与它们在原文的因果关系相反）

例如，

Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, Why We Should, Like, Care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive—there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper. (2005-4)

To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?

[A] Logical thinking is not necessarily related to the way we talk.

责任编辑:gaoyan